Setelah protes ‘PROTES’ yang dirasakan kurang umpph tempoh hari, diharap pimpinan Pakatan Rakyat dapat bersama-sama memikirkan satu hala tuju yang baru (atau menetapkan satu garisan yang jelas) tentang perjuangan sebenar yang mahu diharungi bersama-sama. Ini penting kerana perjuangan yang menuju matlamat yang sama tanpa menyinggung hati dan perasaan pihak-pihak yang lain merupakan tunjang perjuangan yang sebenar dan bukannya hanya untukmemuaskan hati pihak-pihak tertentu sahaja.

Setelah membaca komen Sdr Nik Abduh (sila klik sini), saya juga dapat merasakan apa yang beliau rasa. Perenggannya yang terakhir mempunyai makna yang cukup dalam dan saya pun lebih kurang setuju dengan pandangannya. Berjuang dengan mengekori kelibat yang lain umpama mendapat pingat emas olimpik tetapi posisinya hanyalah pemain simpanan yang tak pernah diturunkan sepanjang permainan. Suka tetapi benak hati ada berbaur perasaan duka.

Tetapi adakah perlu untuk kita membuka alternatif lain bagi mencapai erti sebuah kejayaan dalam perjuangan. Jawapannya adalah ya dan tidak. Ya sekiranya jalan perjuangan yang asal jauh melempang dan tidak sekiranya perjuangan masih selari dengan matlamat asal yang amat memerlukan perhubungan secara ‘simbiosis’ antara pasukan.

Mahukah kita melihat perjuangan bersama yang kita sudah nampak putiknya dan InsyaAllah dengan izin Allah akan mengeluarkan buah tak lama lagi akan musnah seperti jatuhnya kesultanan melayu Melaka (yang sampai sekarang tak ada Sultan) atau silapnya strategi yang menjatuhkan Enron yang boleh dikatakan korporat yang sangat unggul pada zamannya.

Jawapannya, terserah kepada anda semua kerana ianya berada dalam hati masing-masing.. bukannya pada mata, bukan pada nafsu, bukan pada akal tetapi pada hati kalian~ bak kata Kumpulan Nasyid Hijaz

 

KUALA LUMPUR: Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim has lodged a report at the Federal Territory Religious Department against Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan saying the 23-year-old former aide has falsely accused him of fornication.

He made the report under Section 41 Qazaf (false accusation) of the Federal Territory Syariah Criminal Offence Act 1997.

Under Section 41, if someone accuses another person of fornication “without providing four male witness or the iqrar (oath) of the person who is accused” the accuser has committed an offence in which he (the accuser) can be fined up to RM5,000 or jailed up to three years or both.

Speaking to reporters Wednesday after he met with Muhammad Ajib, the director-general of the enforcement unit, Anwar said he had made the report under qazaf based on advice from his lawyers and religious scholars to clear his name and that of his family “from this malicious attack on my character.”

“It’s demeaning to me and my family. This slander is a major issue because it involves a sexual crime and attempts to mislead the Muslim population to attack me and my character,” he said adding that the accusation was fabrication and clearly politically motivated.

Early this month, a former PKR volunteer, Saiful, claimed that Anwar had sodomised him at a condominium at Bukit Damansara. He made a police report on the matter.

Saiful also challenged the de facto PKR leader to a mubahalah which is to take an oath before God to show who is telling the truth by seeking God’s curse to befall the lying person.

Anwar who was accompanied by his wife Datin Seri Wan Azizah Wan Ismail and lawyer Kamar Ainiah Kamaruzaman, said he was prepared to take part in a mubahalah if the ulamak and syariah courts advise him to do so.

“I am leaving it to the Islamic scholars. It is not a question of courage or that I am not prepared to take an oath but because it is a religious issue – not a political game – so I have to be (correctly) advised about it.

“If the ulamak and syariah court advise this needs to done, then I will do it,” he said.

Anwar said Muslim scholars had advised him against doing anything that transgressed Islamic rule.

“This is a criminal offence. It must be investigated. There’s nothing in Islamic law that allows you to take an oath when it is a criminal offence.

“Otherwise a murderer can swear on the Quran and get away scot-free,” he said, adding that this (mubahalah proposal) was a form of trickery to delude the Muslims as whatever he did could influence a great number of Muslims in the country.

His lawyer Kamar Ainiah said under Islam a man was innocent until proven guilty and it was up to the accuser to bring forward four witnesses to prove his accusation.

To a question that Saiful had claimed that Anwar had sodomised him against his will and hence the matter should be considered as rape rather than fornication, Kamar Ainiah said, this was not logical as the former (Saiful) was much bigger and stronger than Anwar and should have been able to fight him off if that was so.

Source : The Star Online

Visitors Since June 2008

© 2011 A Particle of Boredom Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha