Hopefully, we still have some good men and good judiciary system to drive us to greater height…

—————————–

Mahkamah Tinggi hari ini memutuskan News Straits Time Berhad (NSTP) membayar ganti rugi berjumlah RM100 ribu kepada Penasihat Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR). Mahkamah turut mengarahkan NSTP membayar RM20 ribu sebagai kos mahkamah. Keputusan itu diumumkan Hakim Harminder Singh Dhaliwall di Mahkamah Tinggi Jalan Duta petang tadi.

Pada 2003, Anwar memfailkan saman terhadap NSTP dan bekas ketua pengarang kumpulan Tan Sri Abdullah Ahmad, di atas artikel yang bertajuk ‘Anwar’s Link To US Lobbyist’ yang disiarkan pada 2002. Anwar menuntut RM100 juta bagi ganti rugi am, ganti rugi teladan, ganti rugi tambahan, faedah, kos dan relif lain yang difikirkan sesuai oleh mahkamah.

Artikel itu menyentuh dakwaan hubungan Anwar dengan pelobi Washington DC, hubungan kewangan beliau dan organisasi dikenali Asia Pacific Policy Centre (APPC) dan tuduhan dalam akuan bersumpah oleh bekas Penolong Gabenor Bank Negara Malaysia, Datuk Abdul Murad Khalid.

 

After so many days of ‘investigation’, and soon the Pilihanraya Kecil Permatang Pauh…  (which is the choosen date by SPR is ridiculuous (how can Voting Day is a working day), &@$*$%^^** has initiated the script to bring down DSAI, starting on Tomorrow at Jalan Duta Court.

—————————————————————————

(THE STAR )KUALA LUMPUR: Police on Wednesday served notice to PKR adviser Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim to appear at the Jalan Duta sessions court here at 10am Thursday.

The notice was served at Anwar’s house, says his lawyer Sankara Nair.

Deputy Inspector-General of Police Tan Sri Ismail Omar confirmed that the police had served Anwar with a written notice requesting he present himself at the Jalan Duta Sessions Court here at 10am Thursday to answer to sodomy charges.

It is learnt that Brickfields CID chief Deputy Supt Jude Pereira served the order on Anwar personally at his house in Bukit Segambut at about 12.15pm Wednesday.

“We carried out our investigations in accordance with the existing laws of our country and forwarded our findings to the Attorney-General’s Chambers for their advice.

“The A-G’s Chambers has decided to charge Anwar,” he said.

Anwar is expected to be charged either under Section 377A or Section 377C of the Penal Code.

Section 377A covers carnal intercourse against the order of nature and carries a maximum of 20 years’ jail and whipping.

It reads as follows: “Any person who has sexual connection with another person by the introduction of the penis into the anus or mouth of the other person is said to commit carnal intercourse against the order of nature.”

Section 377C reads: “Whoever voluntarily commits carnal intercourse against the order of nature on another person without the consent, or against the will, of the other person, or by putting the other person in fear of death or hurt to the person or any other person, shall be punished with imprisonment for a term of not less than five years and not more than 20 years, and shall also be liable to whipping.”

Sections 377A and 377C are both non-bailable offences. However, under Section 388 of the Criminal Procedure Code, the court has the discretion to grant bail.

 

KUALA LUMPUR: Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim has lodged a report at the Federal Territory Religious Department against Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan saying the 23-year-old former aide has falsely accused him of fornication.

He made the report under Section 41 Qazaf (false accusation) of the Federal Territory Syariah Criminal Offence Act 1997.

Under Section 41, if someone accuses another person of fornication “without providing four male witness or the iqrar (oath) of the person who is accused” the accuser has committed an offence in which he (the accuser) can be fined up to RM5,000 or jailed up to three years or both.

Speaking to reporters Wednesday after he met with Muhammad Ajib, the director-general of the enforcement unit, Anwar said he had made the report under qazaf based on advice from his lawyers and religious scholars to clear his name and that of his family “from this malicious attack on my character.”

“It’s demeaning to me and my family. This slander is a major issue because it involves a sexual crime and attempts to mislead the Muslim population to attack me and my character,” he said adding that the accusation was fabrication and clearly politically motivated.

Early this month, a former PKR volunteer, Saiful, claimed that Anwar had sodomised him at a condominium at Bukit Damansara. He made a police report on the matter.

Saiful also challenged the de facto PKR leader to a mubahalah which is to take an oath before God to show who is telling the truth by seeking God’s curse to befall the lying person.

Anwar who was accompanied by his wife Datin Seri Wan Azizah Wan Ismail and lawyer Kamar Ainiah Kamaruzaman, said he was prepared to take part in a mubahalah if the ulamak and syariah courts advise him to do so.

“I am leaving it to the Islamic scholars. It is not a question of courage or that I am not prepared to take an oath but because it is a religious issue – not a political game – so I have to be (correctly) advised about it.

“If the ulamak and syariah court advise this needs to done, then I will do it,” he said.

Anwar said Muslim scholars had advised him against doing anything that transgressed Islamic rule.

“This is a criminal offence. It must be investigated. There’s nothing in Islamic law that allows you to take an oath when it is a criminal offence.

“Otherwise a murderer can swear on the Quran and get away scot-free,” he said, adding that this (mubahalah proposal) was a form of trickery to delude the Muslims as whatever he did could influence a great number of Muslims in the country.

His lawyer Kamar Ainiah said under Islam a man was innocent until proven guilty and it was up to the accuser to bring forward four witnesses to prove his accusation.

To a question that Saiful had claimed that Anwar had sodomised him against his will and hence the matter should be considered as rape rather than fornication, Kamar Ainiah said, this was not logical as the former (Saiful) was much bigger and stronger than Anwar and should have been able to fight him off if that was so.

Source : The Star Online

Visitors Since June 2008

© 2011 A Particle of Boredom Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha